Re: kerneld message / Workaround
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, brian moore wrote:
> > > Perhaps you should file a bug on it?
> > Don't be that fast.
> Why not? A bug is a bug. 'man kerneld' is quite clear that kerneld
> should -not- be run on a 2.2 kernel. Yet /etc/init.d/kerneld is quite
> happy to run it on a 2.2 kernel because it uses an incorrect method for
> testing the version of the kernel.
> Why is that not a bug?
I guess the developers have just left the user decide whether to use
kerneld or not. You are right to think that they could have done it nicer
by using uname, for example. So, I agree -- send a bug report (with
severity of about whishlist) if you would.