Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?

[Peter Allen <P.Allen@pallen.uklinux.net>]

Peter Allen wrote:
> 
> Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:17:15 +0200 (+0000), J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:12:06 +0200, Konrad Podloucky wrote:
> > > > Yeah, but haven't they removed all patented code recently? (At least the
> > > > latest beta doesn't contain any Fraunhofer code anymore, afaik)
> > >
> > > Patents cover algorithms (and thus specific implementations of those
> > > algorithms in code). Removing code copyrighted by Fraunhofer doesn't
> > > automatically mean the patent is not an issue anymore.
> >
> > In the US they do.  Surely someone in (say) the UK could package it - we
> > couldn't have it in the main section, but people living in countries where
> > software patents don't exist would be okay.
> >
> > Adrian
> 
> Software patents cover a wider area.  They are deffinatly applicable
> here in the uk, and it looks like frauhoffer (spl?) think they are
> applicable in sweden as well (They are threatening the bladeenc
> author/maintainer)
> so _if_ that happens it looks like the whole of the europe is out
> etc.etc.
> 
>                         Peter Allen

Sorry, wrong list and irrelevent message.  I'm doing well today...

			Peter Allen