[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gv

I had a problem at one time with one of the font definition files
distributed with either gv or ghostscript being corrupted.  Literally
some binary barfage in the middle of a text file.  I fixed it manually,
notified the package manager, and Peter Deutsch.  IIRC it was a font
that he doesn't include by default, problem happened downstream.

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:32:14AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
> When I run gv, I have the following:
> Error: /invalidfontGNU Ghostscript: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
>  in findfont
> Operand stack:
>    1   --dict:4/4--   --dict:4/4--   Times-Roman   Font   Times-Roman
> 28765   Times-Roman   --nostringval--   Times-Roman   Courier
> Execution stack:
>    %interp_exit   .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--
> --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--
> --nostringval--   false   1   %stopped_push   1   3   %oparray_pop
> .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2
> %stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --
> I believe that Times-Roman is included in my installed font packages:
> okidz@bdg:~$ dpkg -l | grep xfonts
> ii  xfonts-100dpi  3.3.5-2        100 dpi fonts for X
> ii  xfonts-75dpi   3.3.5-2        75 dpi fonts for X
> ii  xfonts-base    3.3.5-2        standard fonts for X
> ii  xfonts-scalabl 3.3.5-2        scalable fonts for X
> Is there anything that I should install?
> Thanks in advance,
> Oki
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null

Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>         http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
  Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.                       http://www.opensales.org
   What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?      Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
     http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/      K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595  DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0

Attachment: pgpoN3HDShDdx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: