[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [q] koffice-cvs doesn't run -- any idea?



  "Ivan" == Ivan E Moore, <rkrusty@tdyc.com> writes:
  Ivan>  it's because of some changes in kdelibs/kdebase and I hadn't gotten
  Ivan> around to rebuilding koffice so that it would work again. :)
  Ivan> 
  Ivan> This evening there will be a clean set of .deb's for all packages
  Ivan> based on current (as of a few hours ago) upstream source.

Thanks, that sounds great! Guess I can stop scratching my head now, and send
some virtual beers over to you.

Dirk

  Ivan> 
  Ivan> Ivan
  Ivan> 
  Ivan> On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 04:24:04PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
  Ivan> Content-Description: forwarded message
  >> Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 11:10:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
  >> <edd@debian.org> Subject: koffice-cvs unresolved libs To: Debian Users
  >> <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
  >> 
  >> 
  >> (Please CC me on replies as I am not debian-user.)
  >> 
  >> Just had a first look at the koffice work-in-progress using Ivan's fine
  >> kde archive, but there is something wrong with the dependencies:
  >> 
  >> edd@sonny:~> kword kword: error in loading shared libraries:
  >> /usr/lib/libkofficecore.so.1: undefined symbol:
  >> setDocument__13KXMLGUIClientRC12QDomDocumentb
  >> 
  >> even though 'ldd $(which kword)' shows all libraries. This is on an
  >> up-to-date frozen machine.  What am I missing?
  >> 
  >> Thanks for any insight, Dirk
  >> 
  >> -- According to the latest figures, 43% of all statistics are totally
  >> worthless.
  Ivan>  Content-Description: .signature
  >>  -- According to the latest figures, 43% of all statistics are totally
  >> worthless.
  Ivan>  ---end quoted text---
  Ivan> 
  Ivan> -- ---------------- Ivan E. Moore II rkrusty@tdyc.com
  Ivan> http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC
  Ivan> 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
  Ivan> 
-- 
According to the latest figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.



Reply to: