[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info.

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 02:52:16AM -0400, Will Lowe wrote:
> > So, it is not so much that Debian doesn't have permission to distribute
> > a modified binary package, it is that doing so would open up a whole
> > can'o'worms w.r.t. redistribution... so why go there and possibly cause
> > problems for Debian's distributors, eh.
> That's exactly why it doesn't pass the DFSG test. It's really an
> almost-moot point, really, since apt-get has come along and can auto-build
> the package for you --it'd be tempting to have a fake pine package, which
> would simply "apt-get -b source" the source and then install the .deb
> files.  I think similar schemes have actually been discussed several
> times, always with the end result being that everyone thought that while
> doing so would probably be legal, it'd violat the _spirit_ of the thing. 

its also not trivially possible.  a package's postinst cannot call
dpkg/apt since there is a lock in place.

> This is definitely a FAQ, though. 

don't use pine use mutt :P

/me ducks

Ethan Benson

Attachment: pgpX90uVZYyvp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: