Re: more real runlevels?
- To: kmself@ix.netcom.com
- Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: more real runlevels?
- From: Daniel Barclay <dsb@smart.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 19:49:37 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] E12qlf7-0001H7-00@dsb.smart.net>
- In-reply-to: <20000428023037.C22315@ix.netcom.com> (kmself@ix.netcom.com)
- References: <87vh13zbu6.fsf@amazon.lbin.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004271942340.1907-100000@ugly.wh8.tu-dresden.de> <20000427131742.T4619@cmc.net> <20000427225249.A31016@anomie.ods.org> <20000428023037.C22315@ix.netcom.com>
> From: kmself@ix.netcom.com
> Reasonable rational. Though one preference of mine has been to prepend
> a '_' (eg: _S99foo _K99foo). Makes clear what's been changed. More
> recently, I modify through update-rc.d.
>
Does that work? (Doesn't that break if the control script uses glob
pattern like "[SK][0-][0-9]*"?)
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
dsb@smart.net
(Hmm. A little worrisome: http://www.junkbusters.com/cgi-bin/privacy
http://www.anonymizer.com/snoop.cgi )
Reply to: