RE: Squid ACLs does not work
Can you give me any figures?
Regards,
Onno
At 01:26 PM 3/26/00 +1200, C. Falconer wrote:
>I disagree with your disagreement -grin-
>
>Plain ACLs are too slow especially on a large and/or busy cache.
>
>----------
>From: Onno[SMTP:Onno@Willem.Alexanderschool.nl]
>Sent: Sunday, 26 March 2000 12:58 AM
>To: criggie@ihug.co.nz; 'sgaerner@gmx.net'
>Cc: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
>Subject: Re: Squid ACLs does not work
>
>At 11:35 AM 3/24/00 +1200, C. Falconer wrote:
>[snip]
>>Squid ACLs are messy and not really intended for filtering based on URLs -
>>rather they seem to be for controlling what machines can access your squid
>>cache, and which domains your clients get direct (uncached) access to.
>
>I do not agree with you:
>
>acl proxyallow url_regex "/etc/squid.allow"
>acl proxydeny url_regex "/etc/squid.deny"
>
>and
>
>http_access allow proxyallow allowed_hosts
>http_access deny proxydeny
>http_access allow allowed_hosts
>http_access deny all
>
>In my squid file do the job just fine!
>
>The allow and deny files are all the tools you need.
>The keywords are flat ASCII and row based and give
>all the flexibility you need. I don't see the need
>for any extra software.
>
>Regards,
>
>Onno
>
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
>
>
>
Reply to: