[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

MS Frontpage Ext.




  has anyone experienced any bugs w/ the fp_extensions, for example
 i have a frontpage website loaded on my slink 2.2.14 and when a user tries
 to access the home page w/ netscape 4.7, they get a script error, loads
fine
 w/ any other netscape ver., and not too many problems w/ iexplorer execpt
 that i have a few translucent buttons that don't work properly.

 i know it is not the source code because i have a mirrored site w/ a
hosting
 company, and their fp_extensions work fine, no bugs at all!  They are using
 a unix platform.....

 are there any logs that can pin point the problem, or are there ways to
 debug it?  Not meaning to ask too many questions at once, but i am kind of
 new at this.


 thankx for any replies.......take care...............beavis

> > What system are you using? I installed FP Ext and the tools on a Debian
> slink
> > 2.1 and did not have problems get this tools running.
> >
> > Try www.rtr.com. There you'll normally find the latest release including
> the
> > tools and the source code for the Apache module.
> >
> > Sven
> >
> >
> > On 19-Mar-2000 Werner Reisberger wrote:
> > > Does anybody know how to install Frontpage Server Extension on a
Debian
> > > system with libc6?
> > >
> > > I was able to compile Apache with the frontpage module but the
> installation
> > > of the extension failed becaused the binary therein are compiled
against
> > > libc5 and there aren't any sources @=
> > >
> > > I hate this stuff but some customers wants it.
> > >
> > > -- Werner
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
<
> > > /dev/null
> >
> > ----------------------------------
> > Please reply only to
> > sgaerner@gmx.net.
> > ----------------------------------
> > Date: 20-Mar-2000
> > Time: 23:16:33
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
> /dev/null
> >
> >
>
>


Reply to: