[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SMB printing problems



Swat handles samba setup, shares, printers, users, everything about samba.  It is a very appreciated (by me) package.

-Percival

On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 09:15:02PM +0100, Stephan Hachinger wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Thanks for your answer!
> 
> Isn't SWAT a setup tool for samba? I managed to configure samba correctly
> without any tool, because my network configuration is not very difficult (2
> machines). I think the problem is mainly a difficulty with the scripts for
> th lp printing.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Stephan Hachinger
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Percival <linux@percival.org>
> To: Stephan Hachinger <Stephan.Hachinger@gmx.de>
> Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2000 7:01 PM
> Subject: Re: SMB printing problems
> 
> 
> >
> > This isn't a solution to your particular problem, but I had similar
> difficulties setting up SMB, until I found SWAT.  I try to run a secure box,
> so I have to start swat only when I need it, but once you figure swat out
> (easier) then smb is simple to configure.  It is a Debian package.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 10:55:20AM +0100, Stephan Hachinger wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I've been trying to set up printing via SMB to an Epson Stylus Color 600
> > > printer (//stephan/stylus600). The smbprint works when I call it with
> > > "smbprint <filename>". So, I wanted that the lpd sends the files to the
> > > filter epson-filter-remote, which filters them with a magicfilter and
> then
> > > sends them to smbprint.
> > >
> > > But I did not succeed, although I tried to set it up according to some
> hints
> > > given in the debian-user archive.
> > >
> > > I attached my configuration files with their directories in a tar.gz.
> file.
> > > Can anyone please help me how to set it up? I'm currently using lpr
> 5.9-29
> > > (from hamm, I think) under a mixed slink/potato (glibc 2.1) system.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks, Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Stephan Hachinger
> >
> >
> 


Reply to: