[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CPU question



dual cpus would probably be best, dual cpu mainboards are usually higher
quality then single cpu mainboards, which helps. load of 5 to 22 eh..damn.

what does that machine do?  

nate

On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Shao Zhang wrote:

shao >Hi,
shao >	I am going to set up a new server which will serve pretty much
shao >	everything except www. At the moment, it has a P166, and the
shao >	load avg is around about 5. The highest once reached to 22.
shao >
shao >	In Australia here, the price of getting two P550 and one P700 is
shao >	roughly the same. So should I get two slower CPUs, or one fast
shao >	CPU. Which case will the server run faster/perform better?
shao >
shao >	Thanks in advance.
shao >
shao >Shao.
shao >
shao >-- 
shao >____________________________________________________________________________
shao >Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1  ___ _               _____
shao >Department of Communications    / __| |_  __ _ ___  |_  / |_  __ _ _ _  __ _ 
shao >University of New South Wales   \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \  / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
shao >Sydney, Australia               |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
shao >Email: shao@cia.com.au                                                  |___/ 
shao >_____________________________________________________________________________
shao >
shao >
shao >-- 
shao >Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
shao >

----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
   Vice President Network Operations       http://www.firetrail.com/
  Firetrail Internet Services Limited      http://www.aphroland.org/
       Everett, WA 425-348-7336            http://www.linuxpowered.net/
            Powered By:                    http://comedy.aphroland.org/
    Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP            http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
11:37pm up 161 days, 11:45, 1 user, load average: 1.06, 1.11, 1.05


Reply to: