Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64

To: Laurent PICOULEAU <lcrpic@a2points.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64
From: Jim B <jamesb-debian@alongtheway.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:12:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0001111410370.786-100000@tarkin.conflict.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000111151206.B3412@coucou.laupic.france>

Actually, shouldn't it be:

append="mem=96M"


On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Laurent PICOULEAU wrote:

> > Yes, but it doesn't work!!! I added "append mem=96M", and the kernel
> > still sees only 64. 8-/
> 
> It should be 'append "mem=96M" ' (without the '). See man lilo.conf

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64
  - From: Laurent PICOULEAU <lcrpic@a2points.com>

References:
- Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64
  - From: Laurent PICOULEAU <lcrpic@a2points.com>

Prev by Date: Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64
Next by Date: Re: icecast-server install error
Previous by thread: Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64
Next by thread: Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread