Re: I thought 2.2.x should detect RAM >64
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> On 11/1/2000 Phil Brutsche wrote:
>
> >gcc 2.95.2? It's likely. The kernel folks don't want to hear bug reports
> >about kernels built with that. Try building with egcs 1.1.2 or gcc
> >2.7.2.3.
>
> that is not true anymore. kernel developers DO want to hear bugs
> about 2.95 now that 2.2.14 is mostly 2.95 OK...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Keyword mostly.
It still wouldn't hurt to check it with egcs 1.1.2 or gcc 2.7.2.3. You
never know, this might be a part that's not 2.95.x safe.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Brutsche pbrutsch@creighton.edu
"There are two things that are infinite; Human stupidity and the
universe. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Reply to: