[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Xircom RealPort Ethernet/Modem on Debian



Hi Florian Lohoff; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> It doesnt work with the Slink PCMCIA utils as i noticed - I backported
> the potato source package 3.1.0 at that time and since then i am 
> a happy real-port user ...
> 
> Thinkpad 390E + Xircom RealPort 
> 
> Now the only thing i havent tried is USB, SVHS and the Lucent Winmodem.
> Everything else works flawlessly (Irda, Sound, XWindows, PCMCIA)...

Sorry to jump into your thread, but I have a related question. I have
just installed potato 2.2.13-based system on an older TP 380XD, and
although I have everything working my Xircom CreditCard modem 56k is a
bit flakey. I have it working now, but for some reason I need to edit
/etc/pcmcia/serial.opts to add "irq 3" in the SERIAL_OPTS line, restart
/etc/init.d/pcmcia and then _reedit_ same file but now I out the "irq 9"
instead, restart the pcmcia services and all is well (because my irq3 is
slow, i.e. there is a conflict someplace). If I just go to "irq 9" it
will _not_ work! My /var/run/stab is always the same, the beeps are
always the same and I am looking for help in how to configure this thing
to work from the getgo on irq 9 (I have no other things on either 3 or 9
per /cat/proc/interrupts, and my modem is taking always port 13f8-13ff
which seems to be available per /cat/proc/ioports). If it helps anyone I
can e-mail my /etc/pcmcia/ and /var/run/stab files. FWIW, my cardbus is
taking irq 15 and network card (when in, but never used) takes irq 10.
I would appreciate any help, as I have read all HOWTOs and whatever I
could dig up on DejaNews to no avail.
TIA,
damir
> 
> Flo
> -- 
> Florian Lohoff		flo@rfc822.org		      	+49-5241-470566
>   ...  The failure can be random; however, when it does occur, it is
>   catastrophic and is repeatable  ...             Cisco Field Notice
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply to: