[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can I get new, but *not* updated packages from "unstable"?



Joe Emenaker wrote:
> 
> For a long time, I've had a policy of updating my servers from stable *and*
> unstable because I wanted the newly packaged stuff but also, more
> importantly, because I wanted bug fixes for security holes asap... without
> having to wait for the next official release of Debian.
> 
> Well, it seems that bug fixed versions are placed in "stable" as well, so I
> don't need "unstable" for that. However, I still would like to get to all of
> the new packages there.
> 
> Is there anyway to use unstable *only* for the packages that *don't* exist
> in "stable"?

Security updates for stable are posted on security.debian.org  and should be
availiable about the same time that unstable's holes are fixed.

Potato is based on glibc2.1.  Slink is glibc2.0... so from what I've read
on many other posts here, it's a BadIdea(tm) to try and mix these due
to the different glibc dependencies.

--Evan


Reply to: