Re: bogomips
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 10:59:18AM +1300, Tim Nicholas wrote:
> > Alberto Maurizi wrote:
> > > Is this normal? I mean, that so low bogomips value.
> >
> > > model name : Pentium 60/66
> > > cpu MHz : 59.999660
> > > bogomips : 23.91
> >
> > I've got an Intel P133. Approximating pro rata using your data
> > gives 23.91 / 60 * 133 = 53. Actual reported value is 53.25
> >
> > So I'd say it looks exactly right.
>
> So mine doesn't make much sence then does it???
>
> this is my /proc/cpuinfo
>
>
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> model name : AMD-K5(tm) Processor
> cpu MHz : 100.230957
> bogomips : 199.88
It makes perfect sense, for an AMD-K5. Bogomips are as their name
implies, bogus. Bogomips only make sense with respect to one particular
CPU family. There is a bogomips explanation somewhere out there, in a
FAQ somewhere else, too, no doubt.
--
William Burrow -- New Brunswick, Canada
How the Internet explodes myths...
- the GOOD TIMES email virus hoax, brought to life courtesy Microsoft
- MAKE MONEY FAST brought to reality on Wall Street by dot-coms and Linux
Reply to:
- References:
- bogomips
- From: Alberto Maurizi <alberto@sif.it>
- Re: bogomips
- From: "Paul Keenan" <r11354@email.sps.mot.com>
- Re: bogomips
- From: Tim Nicholas <tim@krondor.earthlight.co.nz>