Re: recommend mp3 encoder

["Stephan Hachinger" <Stephan.Hachinger@gmx.de>]

Hello!

IMHO, encoding with more than 128 kbps makes sense. I use bladeenc, which
offers much better sound quality at 160 or 256 kbps. At 128, I can hear the
blips clearly (maybe because of BladeEnc).

Kind Regards,

Stephan Hachinger


----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Fluch <fluch@rock.helsinki.fi>
To: Arcady Genkin <a.genkin@utoronto.ca>
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: recommend mp3 encoder


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Thomas Keusch wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 03:55:55PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> >
> > > I'm looking for the highest compression quality possible. I don't care
> > > about speed (nor about interface) at all. Is there anything
compareable
> > > to Fraunhoffer encoder under win32 for Linux?
> > >
> > > I'll be encoding wavs into 256 KBps mp3's.
>
> AFAIK encoding with mor then 128kBps doesn't make sense, since there is no
> significant change in quality anymore...
>
> Martin
>
> - --
> Where do you want to go today? - As far from Redmond as possible!
>
> For public PGP-key: finger mfluch@mathphys.fsk.uni-heidelberg.de
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3ia
> Charset: noconv
>
> iQCVAwUBODmt4rCGSMW7I2etAQH8AwP/apwHnq0iruGDQkGLpAV25oOJl817HG+i
> zHM9F8NSVXcYLMLSDUGrWNRLblNSvFAgJP51dVHx7DwRKJyM5At6DUY0zg7KZypV
> /209yINlzG5pGf/a0Jmq51rnBnKg1fgj/0/P1M2UufNwNZqeZTjiad4NECVjvlbN
> ONHcQ1SKNoE=
> =UOQ1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
/dev/null
>