Re: Why use Enlightenment?
i agree ..it looks great..if your willing to sacrafice the speed..for some
its worth it ..its always nice to have the choice. i for use chose
afterstep, and it flies. kde is a DOG compared to it..i havent tried E for
a couple years back then it was pretty slow ..but was useable..never
figured out how to edit the menus to add programs so i stopped usin it.
nate
----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
10:39pm up 76 days, 10:06, 1 user, load average: 0.34, 0.38, 0.36
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, David J. Kanter wrote:
> Am I the only one who finds Enlightenment bloated, too busy and too hard to
> read? I'm willing to listen to those who use it; but after trying it out
> last night, I'm not too willing to switch from my speedy and trusty fvwm2 or
> window maker.
> --
> David J. Kanter
> djkanter@nwu.edu
>
> "Humans have an innate tendency to attribute significance to anomalies
> and coincidences."
> -- John Allen Paulos, mathematics professor at Temple University
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: