Re: Why use Enlightenment?

[aphro <nate@firetrail.com>]

i agree ..it looks great..if your willing to sacrafice the speed..for some
its worth it ..its always nice to have the choice.  i for use chose
afterstep, and it flies. kde is a DOG compared to it..i havent tried E for
a couple years back then it was pretty slow ..but was useable..never
figured out how to edit the menus to add programs so i stopped usin it.

nate

----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
   Vice President Network Operations       http://www.firetrail.com/
  Firetrail Internet Services Limited      http://www.aphroland.org/
       Everett, WA 425-348-7336            http://www.linuxpowered.net/
            Powered By:                    http://comedy.aphroland.org/
    Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP            http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
10:39pm up 76 days, 10:06, 1 user, load average: 0.34, 0.38, 0.36

On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, David J. Kanter wrote:

> Am I the only one who finds Enlightenment bloated, too busy and too hard to
> read? I'm willing to listen to those who use it; but after trying it out
> last night, I'm not too willing to switch from my speedy and trusty fvwm2 or
> window maker.
> -- 
> David J. Kanter
> djkanter@nwu.edu
> 
> "Humans have an innate tendency to attribute significance to anomalies
> and coincidences."
>   -- John Allen Paulos, mathematics professor at Temple University
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>