Re: Can't get seconf NIC to work
Hi guys,
You may remember I lost my second NIC when I upgraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.13.
I asked for urls and set off to rtfm.
Perhaps the problem is that I need to pass ether arguments via lilo along
these lines:
boot=/dev/hda1
root=/dev/hda1
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
vga=normal
delay=20
image=/2.2.13kernel
label=linux ether=10,0x630,eth0 ether=9,0x620,eth1
read-only
image=/vmlinuz
label=lold
read-only
The relevant parts of /proc/io and /proc/pci are :
6200-627f : eth1
6300-631f : eth0
Ethernet controller: DEC DC21041 (rev 33).
Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 10. Master Capable.
Latency=96.
I/O at 0x6200 [0x6201].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe4000000 [0xe4000000].
Bus 0, device 9, function 0:
Ethernet controller: Realtek 8029 (rev 0).
Medium devsel. IRQ 9.
I/O at 0x6300 [0x6301].
Does this look right?
Thanks in advance.
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Kirk <patrick@kirks.net>
To: <debian-User@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 12:34 PM
Subject: Can't get seconf NIC to work
> Hi all,
>
> Effortless is one word I wouldn't use to describe the move to the 2.2
> kernel. Can anyone suggest why lsmod shows nothing, why I can't load the
> tulip module or what I need to do to add a route for 10.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> enterprise:~# cat /proc/modules
> enterprise:~# route add -net 10.0.0.0 dev eth1
> SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
> enterprise:~# cd /lib/modules/2.2.9/net/
> enterprise:/lib/modules/2.2.9/net# ls
> dummy.o tulip.o
> enterprise:/lib/modules/2.2.9/net# modprobe tulip
> /lib/modules/2.2.9/net/tulip.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
> /lib/modules/2.2.9/net/tulip.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.2.9/net/tulip.o
failed
> /lib/modules/2.2.9/net/tulip.o: insmod tulip failed
> enterprise:/lib/modules/2.2.9/net# rmmod de4x5.o
> de4x5.o: No such file or directory
> enterprise:/lib/modules/2.2.9/net# lsmod
> Module Size Used by
> enterprise:/lib/modules/2.2.9/net#
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
/dev/null
>
>
Reply to: