Re: Fw: SIOCADDRT
Yep. Looks like the 2.2.x series is smart enought not to
need them. Course, I still include them for completion's
sake.
Bryan
On 20-Oct-99 Colin Marquardt wrote:
> * Charles Lewis <lewisc@swau.edu> writes:
>
>> The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out
>> the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were
>> needed in slink and not potato I don't know.
> --^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-----^^^^^^^^^^--------------
> --kernel 2.0.x--------kernel 2.2.x------------
>
> --
> Colin Marquardt <colin.marquardt@gmx.de>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
> /dev/null
Reply to: