Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)

To: Ed Cogburn <ecogburn@greene.xtn.net>
Cc: Debian-Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)
From: Art Lemasters <alemas@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 04:11:27 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991006041127.A555@luvmusl.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 37FB138B.615ACFEB@greene.xtn.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991006091136.4796A-100000@mail.lasaltech.com> <87ogedl0p1.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu> <[🔎] 86yadh194n.fsf_-_@chia.someotherplace.org> <[🔎] 37FB138B.615ACFEB@greene.xtn.net>

On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 05:16:59AM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote:

[...]
> 	I'm not strongly for or against.  I could certainly live with another
> mailing list, but whatever we do, lets leave debian-devel to the
> developers.

     I agree, Ed.  ...developers and future developers.  :-)  Hmmm.  A
new list called "debian-unstable" or even "debian-test" (which might be a
little more appealing for Web surfers who see the list info) might not be a
bad idea, though.

Art

Reply to:

References:
- RE: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO. MENU UPLOAD ON OCT 2 KILLS SYSTEMS
  - From: "A. M. Varon" <andre@mail.lasaltech.com>
- Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)
  - From: David Coe <david.coe@someotherplace.org>
- Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)
  - From: Ed Cogburn <ecogburn@greene.xtn.net>

Prev by Date: Mail won't leave system
Next by Date: Re: fatal error in SO 5.1
Previous by thread: Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)
Next by thread: Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread