Re: What is the reasonable performance of a home 10mbps LAN
> On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:18:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 minxu@sci.ccny.cuny.edu wrote:
> >
> > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:E4:2C:8D
> > > inet addr:192.168.14.1 Bcast:192.168.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > RX packets:968323 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:15265
> > > TX packets:913478 errors:3279 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:3280
> > > collisions:59186 txqueuelen:100
> > > Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6400
> >
> > There is some physical cabling problem (or a bad device) - are you using
> > cat 5 cables? Do you have correctly attached ends? Are both devices set to
> > half duplex, etc
> >
> > The Frame: and Carrier counters should both be 0, anything else is very
> > bad
>
> I would also suggest you check the total length of the cables. I'm not
> sure on the limits, but they can only be so long.
>
> Ben
>
The connections are made by 10feet RJ45 cables (10BaseT, the length limit is
100m). The both devices are set to half duplextelnet star. And I used the
diagnostic program (in DOS) to check the cards and OK.
Then how can I locate the spot of problem?
--
Min Xu
City College of NY, CUNY
Email: mxu1@email.gc.cuny.edu
minxu@sci.ccny.cuny.edu
Tel: (O) (212) 650-6865
(O) (212) 650-5046
(H) (212) 690-2119
Reply to: