[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FAQ for ipchains?



I think this how-to is quite clear and enough those wanna
set and maintain a firewall via ipchains

http://howto.linuxberg.com/ptHOWTO/IPCHAINS-HOWTO

HOE
Halis Osman ERKAN


On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Paulo Alexandre Ramos wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> I don't have any FAQ, but I found a site on the Net that has this kind of
> information.
> 
>    http://members.home.net/ipmasq
> 
> 
> I hope that this help you.
> 
> 
> Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ferret@phonewave.net <ferret@phonewave.net>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Date: Quarta-feira, 21 de Julho de 1999 18:56
> Subject: FAQ for ipchains?
> 
> 
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> >
> >I've checked my system and debian.org (did not seem to find anything
> >helpful so far)
> >I'm trying to use ipchains under 2.2.10(slink) to enable port forwarding
> >into my private network, but I cannot seem to get anything working. I'm
> >going so far off my old ipportfw scripts which still work with
> >2.0.36(patched) and the ipmasq script which calls ipchains for me to
> >handle masquerading.
> >
> >Could someone point me to a specific FAQ or HOWTO that can explain how to
> >do what I want?
> >
> >- --Ferret no baka
> >
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: 2.6.3ia
> >Charset: noconv
> >
> >iQEVAwUBN5X/etZwc6w4vgodAQGn5Af/R9oW4ZCrWILu42GkN7TID4J1Q4ybGGYP
> >Jpw/Dsro45cbMn91CRSzTDD6xMo4CMvkaA8m8IRqEPhX8DQx0J2RxBryRZ0SQmIU
> >9y2LcuBLrFDbuBRVqP6+2nx4sS7m+Ui0wQbbHzgB78W/a0JP/AgwfnwV59bfU6JY
> >du8K+OGDPw1YkrMTYq0vg9VuIt6/H2a2deYCARst4m04gLNTh742r3KSSFbBwEPv
> >YeGIM+BHR81k/PFQ/CTOOzngrh01k98u8VFmGSYOzPPIQzUWx7cTvyGQpvKi4hLy
> >mYXspIFXoufahGK3cYTfRhoyVAmSRsNfaLKuFx59uVdWigyWRvQPEw==
> >=ASjp
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >--
> >Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
> /dev/null
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 


Reply to: