Re: do I have to use Redhat?
>partition changes you want, then choose to install packages via Internet, but
>select "dists/unstable main contrib non-free".
I would say dists/potato instead of dists/unstable; here is why:
I once used dists/unstable, and everything worked fine until the next
debian version changeover (such as the one that will soon occur). At that
point, since I had told the system to use unstable, I was upgraded to the
NEW unstable. This is not what I expected, and I was surprised when,
suddenly, over a hundred pacakges were upgraded. And whereas potato
is realtively usable, brand new unstable archives often have many bugs
and pacakging problems.
I am not sure why we actually have those two symlinks (except for historical
purposes) instead of files named 'stable-is-slink' and 'unstable-is-potato',
but there is probably a good reason.
Nonetheless, if you don't ALWAYS want the unstable version, use a real
distribution name instead of 'unstable'.
Carl
Reply to: