Re: mail clients
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Reply to.... Reply-to...
==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==================
>From: "Steve Lamb" <morpheus@rpglink.com>
>To: "Debian Developers" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
>Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 21:47:28 -0700
>Subject: Re: mail clients
On Fri, 21 May 1999 22:41:38 -0500 (CDT), Brad wrote:
>Pretentious, rude, arrogant, and utterly annoying? That sounds like your
>first response! If you don't know how to code, fine. But saying "Do *NOT*
>believe them" about the people who do know how and will help? If you do
>that often, it's no wonder so many ask you to show them the code!
You would not understand how many times I see that question answered and
how many times people will answer "Oh, mutt/fetchmail/procmail works fine."
It does not do what they are asking for, so why even reply?
>It's perfectly fine if you don't code. But consider showing a little
>respect then to those who do, instead of insulting them for not having
>written something that will do exactly what you want with no thought on
>your part.
I do show respect to those that do. More often than not, though, the
people who do code aren't the ones I'm arguing with day in and day out.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
- --
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN0Y3bXpf7K2LbpnFEQJc7wCfYM5Q+SdiL5Rwyr/WhfCPJdQJ/FwAoOP6
75nBFaEBzy7Bl0u6PHKx6GZG
=u7wO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: