Re: kernel 2.2.5 symlinks
See /usr/doc/libc6/FAQ.Debian.gz for the rationale behind this.
Bob
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Stephan Engelke wrote:
> Hi Armin,
>
> > those symlinks. But I've problems to compile some libraries. Someone
> > told me, that this can be caused by different versions of installed
> > includes or libraries, that don't fit together.
>
> the directories vs. symlinks are part of the Debian policy. There are
> no symlinks in order to keep the system headers stable.
> Check www.debian.org - I don't remember the exact URL. Maybe someone
> else could supply the URL or a location in a /usr/doc ?
>
> > Must I delete the directories /usr/include/{arm,linux,scsi} and replace
> > them with those symlinks?
>
> If you do need newer kernel header you can go ahead and save (rename)
> the directories and create the appropirate symbolic links. I've done
> this on my hamm system during the first kernel upgrade and have never
> expierienced an problems with software compiled prior to the change.
>
> So long,
> Stephan
> --
> Stephan Engelke engelke@math.uni-hamburg.de
> *** Life is not fair. But the root password helps. ***
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
>
----
Bob Nielsen Internet: nielsen@primenet.com
Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: w6swe@w6swe.ampr.org
DM42nh http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
Reply to: