Re: MICROSOFT BS FUD
There already has been feedback on the web (and this list) about this.
It does appear that a great effort was made to pull all the stops out
in configuring NT, and little care was given to setting up Linux. IE:
use of a kerenl with know network bugs, none of apache's optimizations
turned on...
--- Rick Macdonald <rickm@home.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
>
> > Well it finally happened. Microsoft has paid
> someone off to fix a
> > benchmark showing that Windows NT is actually
> better than linux.
> >
> >
> http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html
>
> This doesn't look good. Are the results cooked or
> flawed, or the
> configuration not optimal? Or is it true?
>
> ...RickM...
>
>
===
Amateur Radio, when all else fails!
http://www.qsl.net/wa2mze
Debian Gnu Linux, Live Free or .....
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Reply to: