RE: Emacs
If I was looking for a good word processor to run on a small laptop system that has to contain Linux, X and all within 320 Meg, would you recommend emacs or is there something better?
David
-----Message d'origine-----
De: MallarJ@aol.com [SMTP:MallarJ@aol.com]
Date: lundi 12 avril 1999 19:26
À: robbie@scot-mur.demon.co.uk; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Objet: Re: Emacs
In a message dated 4/12/99 11:39:36 AM Central Daylight Time,
robbie@scot-mur.demon.co.uk writes:
> > I think my recommendation as far as xemacs vs emacs goes is that, for
> > a new emacs user, xemacs offers that one advantage of GUIs -- little
> > pull down menus that help you use the editor before you learn all the
> > esoteric keystrokes. Once you've taken advantage of that for a bit
> > using xemacs -nw (no windows) on a terminal is just fine.
> Are there any advantages or disadvantages to using xemacs on a terminal?
>
FYI - Emacs20 under X also provides these drop down menus.
-Jay
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to: