Re: x11amp, lsof & kernels
"Daniel J. Brosemer" <odin@bolverk.dorm.org> writes:
[...]
> 1. x11amp (v 0.9) used to take about 13% CPU according to top... now it's
> sitting steadfast at 35.3% Is it really taking more processor, or is this
> due to some kernel option I might have chosen?
I'm also noticing that things seem slightly more sluggish when sound
is playing than before. Some applications launch faster though and
memory and swap are freed much better now. All in all I guess the
2.2.1 kernel is worth it....
Christopher
Reply to: