On 04-Feb-99 E.L. Meijer \(Eric\) wrote: > Hi all, > > I suppose everyone knows there is a gimp/logo contest for debian > (http://contest.gimp.org/rules/). I find this a bit strange. On the > one hand, the logo must be easily scalable, on the other hand, the gimp > contest demands that it is totally developped in gimp. These are > conflicting demands. I would say there should be a good scalable, > good-looking in black and white, logo in a vector format first, which > can then of course be manipulated in the gimp and raised to great > artistic heights :) In other words, the fact that the logo-contest is > a gimp-contest at the same time, limits the logo designers in a way > that is by no means advantageous to debian. I would suggest that logo > designers are at least _allowed_ to use any other tool they choose as > well. > I think that's a side-effect to using a Gimp Contest to generate a seelectionon to chose from... the rules are pretty much in the hands of Gimp and we get to judge the output... -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <>< * * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------* * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 * * <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++* * KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- * * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ * * <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ * * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------* =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpu8FWKWOgBG.pgp
Description: PGP signature