[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why not as a newsgroup?



	Regarding debian-user-digest, try splitdigest debian package.
	Have a nice day,	Paulo Henrique
Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans (frodo@ccs.neu.edu):
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Mosl Roland wrote:
> 
> > 2.) I am from Austria. $0.9 per hour
> >      for my telephone connection at
> >      night time, but $2.7 at day time.
> > 
> >      So I download newsgroups only
> >      in the cheap night time, and I go
> >      at day time only very short online
> >      for importnat emails.
> > 
> >     But because debian is an email
> >     list, and not a newsgroup, this
> >     technic to avoid high telepohne
> >     bills is not useable.
> > 
> 
> You could subscribe to the debian-user-digest, which will send you all the
> messages posted to debian-user in (I believe) a single, large message.
> This will allow you to download all the messages easily and cheaply at
> night, but it won't help you to organize them.
> 
> I agree with you, though, that a newsgroup would be nice.  But the current
> format is working just fine for me.  One possible problem with a newsgroup
> is that there are a whole bunch of Debian mailing lists.  I don't know how
> much traffic the lists get, but Debian might not have the resources to
> support a news server that gets that much traffic.  (I don't know what
> news server require for resources; I was just speculating.)
> 
> noah
> 
>   PGP public key available at
>   http://lynx.dac.neu.edu/home/httpd/n/nmeyerha/mail.html
>   or by 'finger -l frodo@ccs.neu.edu'
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> 
> iQCVAwUBNpTy7IdCcpBjGWoFAQGqNAQAnRO8X+3IHzi92E6t9xUf/urTXVGl8o1P
> 0Iu0mOwIAPQuOxJG3srdYS0gikOAaEKblBMVd1Kx77p+GXzxJNo8bZ1zCzzsFbr8
> 9bLDN0ZDYJyWOw2RpPZJfgr6+e40x073UPaPQUlsgNoK/HlpsLU2cvx37x6qhPW3
> 10hwVIZoIAs=
> =e+MD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 


Reply to: