Re: [Debian] iso9660 in 2.0.34 ?
Ya know,
The 'kernel-package' package automates all of this for you. I had troubles getting
modules to work even though I thought I did all the steps (make dep ; make clean ;
make bzImage ; make modules ; make modules_install ; depmod -a. Then symlinking the
new kernel and running lilo. The kernel booted and all built in support worked perfect
but modules didn't. Leaving my config file unchanged I used kernel-package and
everything worked.). If you use the kernel-package package you don't need to worry
about copying or editing or symlinking and files, it's all done for you and it works
PERFECTLY. At least for me.
In the modules support section of the configuration make sure to enable the third
option that lets you use kerneld for autoloading of modules.
Chris
Jay Barbee wrote:
> > Nico,
> >
> > During your 'make menuconfig', enable the NLS support and you will get
> > the option for ISO9660, FAT, VFAT, etc...
> >
>
> I recompiled mine and I still cannot get the ISO, FAT or VFAT to mount. I also
> cannot load this module manually? I have not looked into this too hard, but I
> have been reading this thread on the list. What I have done (I am not sure if
> this is bad or not) is copy the .config from the old kernel to the new one? I was
> going to can this and start from scratch. Could this be the source of so many
> peoples (including mine) problems?
>
> --Jay Barbee
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to: