Re: Problem with modules_install
Hi,
I see. If you are using make modules_install, you are not
using make-kpkg. In that case, my suggestion to you is: use make-kpkg
from kernel-package; it really takes care of these details for
you. You never run make modules_install.
manoj
>>"graeve" == graeve <graeve@cistron.nl> writes:
graeve> On 12 Jul 1998 06:38:33 +0200, srivasta@datasync.com (Manoj
graeve> Srivastava) wrote:
>>>"graeve" == graeve <graeve@cistron.nl> writes:
graeve> Even with make-kpkg the modules don't end up in the right place.
>> Could you elaborate? Where do the modules end up? Where should
>> they be ending up? Would it be possible to access the .deb files
>> produced? Have you filed a bug report?
>>
graeve> I don't think it's some kind of bug. There must be something
graeve> I'm doing wrong because it doesn't matter what version of
graeve> Debian I'm using, the module copying allways goes wrong. The
graeve> modules end up nowhere, they just stay where they are created
graeve> and with the make modules_install I just see cp file.o no
graeve> such file or directory.
--
One basic notion underlying Usenet is that it is a cooperative.
Having been on USENET for going on ten years, I disagree with
this. The basic notion underlying USENET is the flame. Chuq Von
Rospach, chuq@Apple.COM
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to: