Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
"Young, Ed" <Ed.Young@echostar.com> writes:
> Thanx for the fast replies.
>
> I'd like to have two emacsen if possible or one that will fit the bill for
> both purposes. The machine I'm working on upgrading is going to be an
> experimental Amateur radio packet machine and is somewhat minimalist. (486
> dx66 w 8Megs, ~600Megs HD) I want to be able to run emacs from the console
> occasionaly and from X normaly. I've never used Xemacs but I doubt it will
> run from the console, but I've heard good things about it. Currently, X
> isn't working and until I get X working on this machine (a whole nother
> thread) I'd like to try it as long as it will coexist with GNU Emacs.
> Any comments or caveats or experiences here?
Both emacs and xemacs run fine on both the console and under X-windows.
Xemacs is somewhat spiffier under X, and comes with more packages pre-
installed than emacs. All four of the emacsen packages can be installed
simultaneously, thanks to the hard work of several Debian developers.
HTH,
Norris
--
Norris Preyer (541) 962-3310 (office)
Physics Program (541) 962-3873 (fax)
Eastern Oregon University npreyer@eou.edu
La Grande, OR 97850 http://physics.eou.edu/npreyer.html
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to: