Re: Pine license and other GPL rants (Re: Debian too difficult, Red Hat?)
George Bonser wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Are you advocating that we _not_ follow pine's license and
> > distribute modified binaries anyway? Thus breaking the law?
>
> No, I am advocating getting the binary approved.
That's likely not manageable.
What happens the next day when a new bug is submitted to the bug
tracking system?
What happens when a major security hole is published on the net,
and it takes Debian 3 months to get yet anothet binary approved?
Peter
Reply to: