Re: SANE install catch-22
Is the list catching up on OLD mail or has someone forgotten to set
their clock up?
Subject: SANE install catch-22
Date: Mon, Jan 01, 1996 at 08:12:48PM +0000
In reply to:Ted Llewellyn
Quoting Ted Llewellyn(llewell@interport.net):
>
> Well, this is very pretty. I'm running Debian 2.0 with the default
> SANE--the doc says v0.71 but I think it's v0.74. I was going to upgrade
> to version 1.0. To do that, I have to install the new libc6, and to do
> that I have to upgrade libstdc++2.8, and apparently to do THAT, dpkg has
> to unconfigure itself. Since I'm running dselect, how is this supposed
> to work? Here is the output from dselect:
>
> dpkg: considering removing libstdc++2.8 in favour of libc6 ...
> dpkg: no, dpkg is essential, will not deconfigure
> it in order to enable removal of libstdc++2.8.
> dpkg: regarding .../base/libc6_2.0.7u-7.1.deb containing libc6:
> libc6 conflicts with libstdc++2.8 (<< 2.90.29-2)
> libstdc++2.8 (version 2.90.29-0.6) is installed.
> dpkg: error processing
> debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/base/libc6_2.0.7u:
> conflicting packages - not installing libc6
>
> Thanks,
> Ted
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
>
--
Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit
patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit
microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of
competition.
_______________________________________________________
Wayne T. Topa <wtopa@ix.netcom.com>
Reply to: