Fwd: Re: running dselect on 4 computers.
I believe this was intended for the list.
>Resent-Date: 9 Dec 1998 19:04:11 -0000
>Resent-Cc: "recipient.list.not.shown":;
>X-Envelope-Sender:
>alias-moderators-muc-lists-debian-user-owner@moderators.muc.de
>Delivered-To: alias-moderators-muc-lists-debian-user@moderators.muc.de
>Old-Return-Path: <news@mail.lrz-muenchen.de>
>To: muc-lists-debian-user@moderators.muc.de
>Path: not-for-mail
>From: Ingmar Hartl <hartl@imo.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
>Newsgroups: muc.lists.debian.user
>Subject: Re: running dselect on 4 computers.
>Date: 9 Dec 1998 19:03:45 GMT
>Organization: [posted via] Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
>Lines: 28
>Distribution: world
>Nntp-Posting-Host: otto.imo.physik.uni-muenchen.de
>User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980514 (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.33 (i586))
>Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/28485
>X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
>
>Ole J. Tetlie <olet@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>
>> | I heard that it's now possible to do installation of packages on
>> | several nodes
>> Have you considered 'dpkg --get-selections' and 'dpkg
>> --set-selections'?
>
>I have a similar problem: We use have at our institute about 10
>nodes running with debian-linux. But some of them have a NFS mounted
>/usr directory with no write permission to this directory.
>
>Is there a easy way to syncronize package update? Till now I upgrade
>one "master" node and do the upgrade of the other nodes by "rdist".
>But sometimes rdist doesn't update the files in the right sequence.
>
>Is there a solution?
>
>Ingmar.
>
>
>--
>Ingmar Hartl Institut fuer Medizinische Optik Oettingenstr. 67,
>80538 Muenchen, Germany; Phone +49 89 2178-2943;Fax -2902; pgp key at
>http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x644D90A9
>PGP Key fingerprint = E9 89 D3 8C D9 B5 AA 15 A1 A4 37 B3 A4 6E DF 8D
>
>
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
>/dev/null
Reply to: