Re: Is this really the right thing to do?
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> Previously Mitch Blevins wrote:
> > One problem with auto-deinstallation of support packages is that
> > you may have other packages that also use the same support package.
> > You would have to grep the dependency database to ensure you
> > weren't removing a library/package that was used elsewhere.
> > Even then, you may have programs in /usr/local that are not tracked
> > by dpkg and need one of those libraries.
>
> Go to http://www.debian.org/~wakkerma/, grab the latest apt-design
> text from there and read section 5.2 . I think that covers what
> you are looking for. If not I'ld like to know what you want to
> see different and why.
>
> Wichert.
You know, you Debian guys are FANTASTIC. Yes, that section describes
*exactly* what I was talking most about.
My concern over the explosion of deb packages (like X coming in more
than a dozen packages or so, with no common prefix in the names), will
be less relevant when this section is coded into apt.
The X example demonstrates a more general problem that may be a largly
policy issue. Should programs that come in multiple deb packages, at
least use a common prefix so people can realize they are part of a
distinct group? Or should apt be given a notion of deb package 'groups'
(as mention in my original post)? I'm not sure, maybe a common prefix
is enough.
--
Ed C.
Reply to: