device or resource busy
Hi,
I recently rolled a new kernel on a 2.0 system and got the following
sound error:
bash: /dev/audio: Device or resource busy
I don't think I have any conflicts, but here are my /dev/sndstat and
some /proc file printouts:
/dev/sndstat:
============
Sound Driver:3.5.4-960630 (Fri Nov 13 23:51:34 EST 1998 root,
Linux puddin 2.0.34 #1 Fri Nov 13 21:43:04 EST 1998 i586 unknown)
Kernel: Linux puddin 2.0.34 #2 Fri Nov 13 23:54:09 EST 1998 i586
Config options: 0
Installed drivers:
Type 1: OPL-2/OPL-3 FM
Type 2: Sound Blaster
Type 7: SB MPU-401
Card config:
Sound Blaster at 0x220 irq 7 drq 1,5
(SB MPU-401 irq 1 drq 0)
OPL-2/OPL-3 FM at 0x388 drq 0
Audio devices:
0: Sound Blaster 16 (4.12)
Synth devices:
0: Yamaha OPL-3
Midi devices:
Timers:
0: System clock
Mixers:
0: Sound Blaster
Here's /proc/interrupts:
========================
1: Sound Blaster8
4: cascade
5: Sound Blaster16
0: 17076701 timer
1: 58434 keyboard
2: 0 cascade
4: 553869 + serial
7: 1 sound blaster
8: 2 + rtc
10: 62637 3c509
13: 1 math error
14: 6209753 + ide0
15: 1226 + ide1
Here's /proc/ioports
====================
0000-001f : dma1
0020-003f : pic1
0040-005f : timer
0060-006f : keyboard
0070-007f : rtc
0080-008f : dma page reg
00a0-00bf : pic2
00c0-00df : dma2
00f0-00ff : npu
0170-0177 : ide1
01f0-01f7 : ide0
0220-022f : sound blaster
02f8-02ff : serial(set)
0300-030f : 3c509
0376-0376 : ide1
0388-038b : OPL3/OPL2
03c0-03df : vga+
03f0-03f5 : floppy
03f6-03f6 : ide0
03f7-03f7 : floppy DIR
03f8-03ff : serial(set)
Here's /proc/devices
====================
Character devices:
1 mem
2 pty
3 ttyp
4 ttyp
5 cua
7 vcs
10 misc
14 sound
Block devices:
2 fd
3 ide0
22 ide1
Here's /proc/dma
===============
1: Sound Blaster8
4: cascade
5: Sound Blaster16
==============================================
If anyone can see something I'm missing, please advise.
TIA! ;-)
--
David S. Jackson http://www.dsj.net
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"Our goal must be--not peace in our time, but peace for all
time."
--Harry S. Truman
Reply to: