[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xbase upgrade



This won't really help, but there was a message a week or more ago
suggesting that people using unstable put the x packages in 'hold' status
unless they were exceedingly brave.

Bob

On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Richard B. Melrose wrote:

> I have been happily using apt-get to maintain a laptop at the `unstable'
> distributon for a few weeks with no real problems. However I am having
> trouble with updates of xbase and xlib6. It looks as though `getreal' is
> really missing (I can find no mention of it anywhere), or maybe there is an
> error in a script. Any suggestions?  Here is a typical transcript (mostly
> dpkg I guess).
> 
> Richard Melrose
> 
> ***
> 
> The following extra packages will be installed:
>   xlib6 
> 2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> 2 packages not fully installed or removed.
> Need to get 0b/907k of archives. After unpacking 5252k will be freed.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
> (Reading database ... 44195 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace xbase 3.3.2.3a-1 (using xbase_3.3.2.3a-3.deb) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: getreal: command not found
> dpkg: error processing xbase_3.3.2.3a-3.deb (--unpack):
>  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
> Preparing to replace xlib6 3.3.2.3a-1 (using xlib6_3.3.2.3a-3.deb) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: getreal: command not found
> dpkg: error processing xlib6_3.3.2.3a-3.deb (--unpack):
>  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  xbase_3.3.2.3a-3.deb
>  xlib6_3.3.2.3a-3.deb
> E: Sub-process returned an error code
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 

----
Bob Nielsen                 Internet: nielsen@primenet.com
Tucson, AZ                  AMPRnet:  w6swe@w6swe.ampr.org
DM42nh                      http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


Reply to: