Re: SMP, again
Rick,
That's it.<G>
Have a good one,
Steve
Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> steve wrote,
>
> > From what I've experienced, this should be
>
> > SMP=1
>
> Ahah. recompiling. So this is a 1 means use it, but defaults to 0/don't,
rather than the number of processors?
>
> thanks
>
> rick
>
> --
> These opinions will not be those of ISU until it pays my retainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMP, again
- From: "Richard E. Hawkins Esq." <hawk@eyry.econ.iastate.edu>
- References:
- Re: SMP, again
- From: "Richard E. Hawkins Esq." <hawk@eyry.econ.iastate.edu>