[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: e2defrag-problem



First, I cannot verify this, but I am almost certain that you should
UNMOUNT before running any defrag program!

Secondly, there is no need for defrag on ext2fs systems unless you
have a REALLY weird setup.

John

Wolfgang Gernot Bauer <Gernot.Bauer@jk.uni-linz.ac.at> writes:

> Im having a problem with the e2defrag-program (debian2.0). I always get
> the following message: 
> 
> > mother# e2defrag -Vr /dev/sda1
> > e2defrag 0.73
> > RCS version $Id: defrag.c,v 1.4 1997/08/17 14:23:57 linux Exp $
> > 
> > e2defrag: Error seeking to end of filesystem
> > mother# 
> 
> The debian-system itself works well... :(
> 
> Here are my mounted drives: 
> > mother# df
> > Filesystem         1024-blocks  Used Available Capacity Mounted on
> > /dev/sda1            2478138 1824826   525196     78%   /
> > /dev/sda4            1019856  711792   308064     70%   /msdos/c
> 
> Anyone had luck with defrag?
> 
> Gernot
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Gernot Bauer               Salzburger Kredit- und Wechsel-Bank AG
> eMail: org@skwb.co.at (Office)       Makartplatz 3, 5020 Salzburg
> Home: Gernot.Bauer@jk.uni-linz.ac.at               Austria/Europe
>                                          Phone: ++43-662-8684-364
> The answer is yes, me.                     Fax:  ++43-662-8684-23
> 
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
John Goerzen   Linux, Unix consulting & programming   jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade)       www.debian.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Visit the Air Capitol Linux Users Group on the web at http://www.aclug.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: