[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Logs of Eric S. Raymond forum



Logs of Saturday's open source forum with Eric S. Raymond are now 
on the some.net website:

	http://www.some.net/transcripts/esr-980509-opensource.log


ESR -------

<lilo>   Tylenol (a developer with the gimp project) asks: doesn't the
         Open Group sort of "taint" the use of the word "open"?
<esr>    We thought about that.  But (a) when we cooked up the term,
         they weren't being twits about the X11 license yet, and (b)
         we kicked around a lot of alternatives and couldn't do better
         than "open source" ... a decision the Freeware Summit
         ratified, BTW.


<esr>    I guess one message I have is that our little factional fights
         don't matter.  We know who the real enemy is, and it's not
         even Bill Gates.  It's inertia, laziness, bad habits, and the
         closed corporate mindset. 


<Teknix> Do you think their embracing of Open Source will bring others
         with them? 
<esr>    I'm talking with three Fortune 500 companies right now, and
         none of them is Netscape or Corel. 


<Culus>  esr: Ooh, good question, How is netscape feeling post-open source?
<esr>    Culus: They're damn happy.  Top software engineers are
         banging on their door looking for jobs.


<esr>   In the long run, what Bill wants won't matter.  If economic
        reality favors the open source model (as I believe it
        generally does) we'll win. If it doesn't we'll lose.  Either
        way Bill Gates is a symptom, not a cause.  Treating him as a
        primary cause is a mistake.



Stephen Tweedie -------

<lilo>  while we're waiting, maybe we can talk with Stephen just a bit
        on his experiences in working in the Linux kernel


<sct>   Of course, there were a lot of _very_ busy people on the
        kernel even then: 
<sct>   for a while, we had "EYC", the Eric Youngdale Consortium, a
        nickname Eric got because he was _obviously_ submitting more
        patches than any one person could generate. :) 


<sct>   As far as the filesystem is concerned, there will probably not
        be much more in 2.2, simply due to the proximity of the code freeze 
<sct>   although I'm going to try to get raw device access in if we can.
<sct>   But there are several very important strands of filesystem
        extensions going on which we plan to start integrating early
        on in 2.3 
<sct>   Ted Ts'o has started work on doing btree directory support,
        and hopefully we can extend that to encompass btree mapping of
        file extents
<sct>   That will make very large directories and very large sparse
        files work rather well on Linux.
<sct>   Journalling support should also be going in (miguel has been
        contributing to some of the design work here, too).
<sct>   Finally there are existing extensions such as the e2compress
        and ACL support which need to be merged, and the 64-bit file
        support. 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  irc.us.openprojects.net  irc.eu.openprojects.net  irc.au.openprojects.net
   irc.debian.org  irc.redhat.com  irc.linux.org  irc.ssc.com  irc.kde.org

            "Open Source, Open Technology, Open Information"


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: