Re: portslave and cistron radiusd packaged for debian
In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95.980317134757.28281B-100000@laranjada.that.com.br>,
Nelson Posse Lago <listas2@that.com.br> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've found out that neither portslave nor cistron radiusd are packaged in
>debian format; they are not in debian's ftp and are not packaged on the
>original site. Since the author is a debian developer and the changelog
>file is in debian's format, this surprises me. Am I missing something or
>should I start packing them myself ;-) ?
Well, I've givien away portslave as we don't use it anymore. Not much sense
in developing an application if you don't use it and can't test it
yourself..
As for radiusd-cistron, I have not much time to do development on it nowadays
(something I regret) and also maintaining the Debian package would take
too much time. It's not complete, docs are missing and I feel that a robust
debian package would need more manpages and docs, something I cannot
cater for at the moment.
But if anyone would like to package those up as .debs and maintain them-
fine with me.
Mike.
--
Miquel van Smoorenburg |
miquels@cistron.nl | Luck is when preparation meets opportunity
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: