Re: lp devices

[Jim Crumley <crumley@belka.space.umn.edu>]

> 
>    Yes, the printer works fine in Windows 95.  I have an old Epson LQ 510, also.
>    I'll try hooking that up  later and see if that helps.  Though I guess
>    if Linux isn't even seeing the parallel port it shouldn't matter.
> 
>    If it isn't seeing the parallel port now, why did it say it captured the 
>    lp1 when I tried loading the lp module with the rescue disk?  I never
>    tried printing while using the rescue disk.  Should I switch to the shell
>    and try redirecting to lp1 while using the rescue disk?
> 
> You can try both of these things.  If either of them make a
> difference, then it's an interesting data point that would help us
> figure out what's wrong.  But I really can't think why they'd make a
> difference.
> 
> Are you using the default kernel or a kernel that you compiled yourself?
> 
I am using the default bo kernel.

-- 
Jim Crumley                 |
crumley@belka.space.umn.edu |


--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to listmaster@debian.org .