Re: lyx 0.12 final in hamm is actually bo ?

[Paul Seelig <pseelig@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de>]

kriol@fnal.gov (Oleg Krivosheev) writes:

> looks like lyx 0.12 binal bo version
> live now in hamm tree.
> 
I unfortunately managed to get the distribution wrong when i packaged
LyX for bo-unstable.  That's why it ended up in hamm.

> Is it known probelm ?
> 
It is probably an already solved problem the time you read this. The
proper version for hamm has been replaced manually and should be
available now on most up to date mirror sites.

                                Thank you, P. *8^)
-- 
   Paul Seelig                         pseelig@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de
   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   My Homepage in the WWW at the URL http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .