Re: Linux on top of win95

["C.J.LAWSON" <C.J.Lawson@cranfield.ac.uk>]

At the risk of apearing to be knit-picking, I ask
(1) How much mempry do you consider as a lot ... from what I can remember
16Mb was sufficient to do away with the swap file (probably except if
you are runnig X ..)

(2) would a seperate drive be faster than a swap file on the same disk?
... This has been a long standing issue between a friend and I

Jon.

On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Ralph Winslow wrote:

> > Is that absolutely neccessary ... one for swap??
> 
> A separate drive certainly isn't (though it wiould improve performance)
> but unless you have a lot of memory, a swap partition is EXTREMELY


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .