Re: X-win more effiecient than Win95?
Þann 14-Jan-98 skrifar Rick Jones:
> Not true. 1) X MUST be operating to benchmark CDE, KDE, or Afterstep
> etc. 2)
> To acurately benchmark the performance of software 'whatever' you have to
> include
> the processes that are handled by X. So you would have to benchmark the
> combnation X + window-manager against Windows. Besides that, Windows is
> more
> than just a wrapper that beautifys the border of the window and adds a menu.
> It
> acts as an interface with the video adapter, keyboard, and mouse, as the
> Xserver
> does.
>
No, Windows is not an interface... and it's a lot more than just a GUI, it's
an operating system as well (as of Win95, WinNT).
And that's right, you need to compare X+Window manager, not just X which was
the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orn Einar Hansen oe.hansen@oehansen.pp.se
oehansen@daimi.aau.dk
voice+fax; +46 035 217194
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: