[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++



On Sep  4, 1997, at 09:10, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote:
 > Jeff Gunter:
 > Wildly off topic, but a fun view into `commercial quality software', let
 > me show you the output of CC under IRIX 64 with the following
 > application:
 > 
 > hw.cc:
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > #include <iostream.h>
 > int main() { cout << "Hello world." << endl; return 0; }
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > > CC -fullwarn -o hw hw.cc
 > "/usr/include/CC/iostream.h", line 236: remark(1506): implicit
 > conversion from
 >           "long" to "int":  rounding, sign extension, or loss of
 > accuracy may
 >           result
 >                 x_blen= (eb>b) ? (eb-b) : 0 ;
 >                         ^
 > 
 > "/usr/include/CC/iostream.h", line 265: remark(1506): implicit
 > conversion from
 >           "long" to "int":  rounding, sign extension, or loss of
 > accuracy may
 >           result
 >                 return x_gptr<x_egptr ? x_egptr-x_gptr : 0 ;
 >                        ^
 > 
 > "/usr/include/CC/iostream.h", line 270: remark(1506): implicit
 > conversion from
 >           "long" to "int":  rounding, sign extension, or loss of
 > accuracy may
 >           result
 >                 if ( x_pptr ) return x_pptr-x_pbase ;
 >                                      ^
 > 
 > "/usr/include/CC/iostream.h", line 646: remark(1430): omission of
 > "class" is
 >           nonstandard
 >         friend          ios ;
 >                         ^
 > 
 > "/usr/include/CC/iostream.h", line 650: remark(1174): variable
 > "iostream_init"
 >           was declared but never referenced
 >   } iostream_init ;     
 >     ^
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > The 64 bit compiler doesn't seem to agree with itself!

Well, "remarks" are just that: comments the compiler has regarding
some non-standard, perhaps non-portable and not-so-secure assumptions
you MAY have made in your code. Nothing more, nothing less. They can
be safely ignored for the greatest part.

 >  E.L. Meijer (tgakem@chem.tue.nl)          | tel. office +31 40 2472189
 >  Eindhoven Univ. of Technology             | tel. lab.   +31 40 2475032
 >  Lab. for Catalysis and Inorg. Chem. (TAK) | tel. fax    +31 40 2455054

-- 
Gonzalo A. Diethelm G.
gonzo@ing.puc.cl


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: