Re: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang.

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang.
From: Alexander Koch <efraim@desire.camelot.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 13:24:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19970316132430.22508@desire.camelot.de>
References: <[🔎] 19970316134601.59507@troy.inka.de>

Quoting Holger Rusch (holger@troy.inka.de):
> Terminal not powerful enough for SLang.

Actual slang is 99-38, so the Debian slang packages is rather old, to say it
nicely.

Alexander

-- 
Tech support is a fine art which, once mastered, virtually ensures
loss of sanity. Joe Thompson <joe@cstone.net>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang.
  - From: Alexander Koch <efraim@desire.camelot.de>

References:
- Terminal not powerful enough for SLang.
  - From: Holger Rusch <holger@troy.inka.de>

Prev by Date: Re: using orielly "cgrep" in cgi under Apache
Next by Date: Base 4
Previous by thread: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang.
Next by thread: Re: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread