RE: TO the holier-than-thou guru
Tomk meister:
I understand and I'll try to help.
First. Perhaps you might consider a Linux upgrade, then perhaps not.
I not very knowledgeable about Linux and have no knowledge at all about
Linux 1.2 or maybe I'm dyslexic and it is 2.1.
I have the exact same situation with my ISP.
Within my /etc/ppp.chatscript I have:
name LOGINNAME (upper case letter have to be substituted )
word \qPASSWORD\q
vice ppp
Why you ask "vice" ; Because the ISP supports ppp, cslip and slip. Therefore when
a prompt is received asking what service I would like to use, the system answers "ppp".
Within my /etc/ppp.options_out I have:
defaultroute /dev/cua2 57600 persist
Why you ask again; This I believe tells ppp that setup the physical interface as the
defaultroute using device /dev/cua2 or COM3 in M$ terms and 57600 is the DTE speed
and I don't remember what the persist does.
Within my /etc/ppp/options I have:
noipdefault
defaultroute
I didn't touch anything else.
I copied no_ppp_on_boot to ppp_on_boot
I placed within ip-up just for the hell of it.
ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -P all -S X.X.X.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
I placeed with ip-down
ipfwasm -F -d accept -m -P all -S X.X.X.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
to shut off what was done in ip-up ( this is for masquerading )
All ip addresses, compression, will and wants will be addressed
via the IPCP, NCP and LCP negotiation when following a successful
login and protocol selection.
I hope this helps.
----------
From: tomk@westgac3.dragon.com[SMTP:tomk@westgac3.dragon.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 1997 3:55 AM
To: peter@pisys.com
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: TO the holier-than-thou guru
Peter Iannarelli writes:
>
> Drop your linen and stop your grinen:
>
> To all those; and you know who you are, who are whinnnnnnnnnnnnnng
> about Debian PPP. Ask your self two questions.
>
> * What do I know about RFC 1331 or more commonly known as PPP.
> * What do I know about my ISP.
--
-= Sent by Debian 1.2 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek KD4CIK - member of ARRL
tomk@westgac3.dragon.com
Reply to: